Examination of five- and four-subtest short form IQ estimations for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth edition (WISC-V) in a mixed clinical sample.

Evaluating general cognitive ability (i.e., intelligence) is common in neuropsychological practice, and identifying abbreviated assessments of intelligence is often advantageous. Despite the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition's (WISC-V) widespread contemporary use, limited research has identified clinically useful short form (SF) full scale IQ (FSIQ) estimations in clinical samples. This study sought to address this gap in the literature. Two hundred sixty-eight pediatric participants (M age = 9.79; 69% male; 88% Caucasian/White) who underwent psychological/neuropsychological evaluation were included. Mean scores for WISC-V scores fell in the low average-to-average ranges, consistent with the clinical nature of this sample (e.g., M FSIQ = 85.3). Ten unique SF combinations with five (pentad) and four (tetrad) subtests, each intentionally selected to represent a breadth of domains subsumed by WISC-V FSIQ, were described by summing subtest age-corrected scaled scores. Regression-based and prorated FSIQ estimates were calculated, and mean differences suggested some prorated estimates should be arithmetically adjusted. Both regression-based and prorated/adjusted methods provided FSIQ estimates that were accurate within five Standard Score points of true FSIQ for approximately 81-92% (pentad) and 65-76% (tetrads) of participants. Prorated/adjusted estimates appeared to provide somewhat better accuracy than regression-based estimates. Relationships between SFs and true FSIQ did not appear to be moderated by participant age, gender, nor how many WISC-V subtests were administered to participants within this archival sample (i.e., 7 vs. 10). Implications of these findings, including benefits, detriments, and other considerations of each SF combination, in addition to limitations of this study, are discussed in detail.

The dimensionality of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition in a clinical sample.

The parent-report Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) is a widely used pediatric neuropsychological measure. Unfortunately, despite meaningful changes from its predecessor, few studies have examined its internal factor structure (now with Behavioral Regulation [BRI], Emotion Regulation [ERI], and Cognitive Regulation [CRI]), and no available literature has investigated higher order models for the BRIEF-2. This study sought to address this shortcoming in the literature by investigating and reporting on the dimensionality of the parent-report BRIEF-2 in a clinical sample. Two hundred and two (202) pediatric neuropsychology examinees (M age = 9.90; 68% males) with complete data for the parent-report BRIEF-2 were included. Descriptive results revealed generally elevated scores across BRIEF-2 scales (Global Executive Composite M T = 70.16). Exploratory factor analyses suggested two factors (CRI and BRI/ERI) should be extracted, and that higher order models should be considered. Confirmatory factor analyses suggested that a direct hierarchical/bifactor two-factor structure (which was more parsimonious than the theoretical three-factor model) provided the best fit, with a bulk of the variance explained by the general GEC factor. The BRIEF-2 may be best interpreted at the overall level, with relatively less weight given to the index variables, particularly within clinical samples with high levels of reported executive functioning difficulties. Implications of these findings, limitations of the present study, and appropriate directions for future inquiry were discussed.

The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Clinicians who evaluate patients with concerns related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are encouraged to include validity indicators throughout clinical assessment procedures. To date, no known previous literature has examined the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) specifically to address noncredible ADHD, and none has attempted to identify an embedded PVT within the 64-card version. The present study sought to address these gaps in the literature with a simulation study. Sixty-seven undergraduate participants (M age = 19.30) were grouped as credible (combining healthy controls and individuals with ADHD) or noncredible (combining coached and uncoached participants simulating ADHD-related impairment) and administered a battery of neuropsychological tests. Results revealed the noncredible group performed significantly worse on several WCST-64 variables, including failure to maintain set, number of trials to first category, and total categories. Raw scores from these variables were entered as predictors as one set in a logistic regression (LR) with group membership as the outcome variable. An exponentiated equation (EE) derived from LR results yielded acceptable discriminability (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = .73) with modest sensitivity (.38) while maintaining ideal specificity (.91), generally commensurate with a standalone forced-choice memory PVT and better than an embedded attention-based PVT. These findings suggested the WCST-64 may be sensitive to noncredible performance in the context of ADHD and reiterates the importance of considering tests of various cognitive abilities in the evaluation of performance validity. Implications of these findings, limitations of the present study, and directions for future inquiry, including cross-validation in clinical samples, were discussed.